Harris

(PC) Allen v. Harris

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20241:22-cv-00688California1,204 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY LEE ALLEN JR., Case No. 1:22-cv-0688 JLT HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

13 v. (Doc. 31) 14 A.W. HARRIS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 Anthony Lee Allen sought to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim and 19 dismissed the complaint without leave to amend. (Docs. 28, 29.) The Court entered judgment on 20 January 4, 2024. (Doc. 30.) 21 On January 18, 2024, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment.” (Doc. 31.) 22 Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider an unspecified order, stating: “I ask the Court alter or amend 23 this judgement based on odd[s] being stacked against me. I was unable to meet legal deadlines 24 and properly address certain motions based on my mail being tampered with . . .” (Id. at 1.) The 25 Court infers that Plaintiff seeks reconsideration order adopting the magistrate judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.