(SS)Manzano

(SS)Manzano v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20241:23-cv-00486California4,141 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGELIO MANZANO, JR., Case No. 1:23-cv-00486-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING

13 v. DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDING CASE TO COMMISSIONER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY2

15 SECURITY,1 (Doc. Nos. 14, 16) 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 Rogelio Manzano, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 20 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for 21 supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is 22 currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. 23 (Doc. Nos. 14, 16-17). For the reasons stated, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for summary 24 judgment, denies Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and orders this matter remanded to 25

26 1 The Court has substituted Martin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.