Bagnall

Bagnall v. CSU Maritime

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20242:23-cv-01606California2,923 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Eric James Bagnall, individually, and as No. 2:23-cv-01606-KJM-CKD Administrator of the Estate of Camren McKay 12 Bagnall, ORDER 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 ws California State University Maritime, et al., 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Eric James Bagnall filed suit against defendants Board of Trustees of the 19 | California State University (CSU), Vineeta Dhillon, John Does 1-10 and ABC Entities □□□□□□ 20 | following the suicide of his son, Camren McKay Bagnall, while Camren was the subject of a 21 | Title IX investigation at CSU Maritime. Defendants CSU and Vineeta Dhillon move to dismiss. 22 | The court grants the motion in part.

' If defendants’ identities are unknown when the complaint is filed, plaintiffs have an opportunity through discovery to identify them. Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980). But the court will dismiss such unnamed defendants if discovery clearly would not uncover their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.