Scalia
(PC) Beckett v. Scalia
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW H. BECKETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01468-JLT-CDB (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDERS TO
SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY
v.
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
SCALIA, et al., FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT
ORDERS
Defendants. (Docs. 44, 46)
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST NUNC
PRO TUNC FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
18 (Doc. 45) 19 Plaintiff Matthew H. Beckett is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On January 22, 2024, the Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate. (Doc. 40.) Specifically, service was to be effected on Defendants B. Hackworth, Hernandez, L. Hurtado, A. Madrigal and J. Scalia. (Id. at 2.) Relevant here, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) was directed to file the “CDCR Notice of E-Service Waiver” form within 40 days, advising whether Defendants agreed to…