Scalia
(PC) Beckett v. Scalia
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MATTHEW H. BECKETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01468-JLT-CDB (PC)
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDERS TO
SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY
13 v.
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
14 SCALIA, et al., FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT
ORDERS
15 Defendants. (Docs. 44, 46) 16
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST NUNC
17 PRO TUNC FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
18 (Doc. 45) 19 20 Plaintiff Matthew H. Beckett is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 21 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 22 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 23 On January 22, 2024, the Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate. (Doc. 40.) 24 Specifically, service was to be effected on Defendants B. Hackworth, Hernandez, L. Hurtado, A. 25 Madrigal and J. Scalia. (Id. at 2.) Relevant here, the California Department of Corrections and 26 Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) was directed to file the “CDCR Notice of E-Service Waiver” form 27 within 40 days, advising whether Defendants agreed to…