Cano

(PC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20241:23-cv-01764California2,050 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAKAZULU SIGIDI Case No.: 1:23-cv-001764-SKO

KASENZANGAKHONA,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO Plaintiff, DENY PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF v. (Doc. 10)

L. CANO, et al.,

14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

17 Plaintiff Shakazulu Sigidi KasenzangaKhona is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff filed his complaint on December 26, 2023. (Doc. 1.) On January 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Writ of Mandate.” (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff contends inmates cannot transfer “when 90 days to parole.” (Id. at 2.) He alleges “there are 2 issues in front of the District Judge and or Magistrate.” (Id.) Plaintiff states that the first issue “is removal of vio.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.