Cano

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAKAZULU SIGIDI Case No.: 1:23-cv-001764-SKO

KASENZANGAKHONA,

12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO Plaintiff, DENY PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR 13 INJUNCTIVE RELIEF v. 14 (Doc. 10)

L. CANO, et al.,

15 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. 16 Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

17 18 Plaintiff Shakazulu Sigidi KasenzangaKhona is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff filed his complaint on December 26, 2023. (Doc. 1.) 22 On January 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Writ of Mandate.” (Doc. 10.) 23 Plaintiff contends inmates cannot transfer “when 90 days to parole.” (Id. at 2.) He alleges “there 24 are 2 issues in front of the District Judge and or Magistrate.” (Id.) Plaintiff states that the first 25 issue “is removal of vio.…