El Tribe v. Attorney General

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATHIAS EL TRIBE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00090-NODJ-CDB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITH

13 v. PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

(Doc. 1) Defendant.

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Mathias El Tribe (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action against Defendant “Attorney General.” (Doc. 1). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, federal courts must screen IFP complaints and dismiss the case if the action is “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (“[S]ection 1915(e) not only permits but requires a district court to dismiss [a IFP] complaint that fails to state a claim.”). Screening…