El Tribe v. Attorney General

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MATHIAS EL TRIBE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00090-NODJ-CDB

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITH

13 v. PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO 14 AMEND

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

15 (Doc. 1) Defendant.

16

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Plaintiff Mathias El Tribe (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 19 in this action against Defendant “Attorney General.” (Doc. 1). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, 20 federal courts must screen IFP complaints and dismiss the case if the action is “frivolous or 21 malicious,” fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or seeks monetary relief against 22 an immune defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 23 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (“[S]ection 1915(e) not only permits but requires a district court to 24 dismiss [a IFP] complaint that fails to state a claim.”). 25 Screening…