Johal

(PC) Paschall v. Johal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20241:24-cv-00154California1,594 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAMAR PASCHALL, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00154-SKO 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

13 v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDERS

14 AMANDEEP JOHAL, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 15 Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 16 17 Plaintiff Lamar Paschall is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff filed his complaint on February 2, 2024, and submitted an Application to Proceed 21 In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) by a Prisoner. (Docs. 1, 2.) Plaintiff stated he is unable to pay the 22 filing fee, is employed and earning 15 cents an hour, does not receive any money from a business, 23 profession or self-employment, rent payments, interest or dividends, pensions, annuities or life 24 insurance payments, disability or workers’ compensation payments, gifts or inheritance, or from 25 “[a]ny other sources.” (Doc. 2 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.