(PC) Kutterer v. Facility Wellpath Medical

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20242:23-cv-02970California267 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCUS KUTTERER, No. 2:23-cv-2970 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 FACILITY WELLPATH MEDICAL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 By order filed February 6, 2024, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty 19 days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now 20 passed, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the 21 court’s order. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 23 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.