Seibel

(PC) Hill v. Seibel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20242:21-cv-02382California676 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:21-cv-2382 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. SCOTLAND, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights when they were deliberately indifferent to his serious mental health needs. On November 13, 2023, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), plaintiff’s response to the motion was due within twenty-one days of service of the motion. After well more than twenty-one days had past, on February 2, 2024 this court gave plaintiff twenty-one days from the date of the order to file a response. (ECF No. 50.) Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to comply with the February 2 order by filing a timely response to defendants’ motion, this court would recommend this case be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to comply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.