(PC) Stone v. Jane Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20241:24-cv-00191California1,012 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 NICHOLAS SCOTT STONE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00191-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

12 v.

ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF

13 JANE DOE, et al.,

INMATE FILING FEE BY CALIFORNIA

14 Defendants. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 15 (ECF No. 4). 16 17 Plaintiff Nicholas Scott Stone is a pro se prisoner in this civil rights action filed on 18 February 12, 2024,1 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). This case is before the Court on 19 Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), filed on March 11, 2024. (ECF No. 4). 20 While the Court will ultimately grant the application because the available information indicates that Plaintiff cannot afford to prepay the filing fee, it notes that Plaintiff has provided false 21 allegations in his IFP application. 22 The Court normally requires prepayment of its filing fee for a civil action. However, a 23 federal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, permits a plaintiff to commence a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.