(SS)Schmitzer

(SS)Schmitzer v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20241:22-cv-01038California11,529 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANAE SCHMITZER, Case No. 1:22-cv-01038-JLT-BAM 12 Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of 15 Social Security,1 (Docs. 17, 19.) 16 Defendant.

17 18

19 INTRODUCTION 20 Plaintiff Danae Schmitzer (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 21 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for Disability Insurance 22 under Title II of the Social Security Act. The parties’ briefing on the motion was submitted, without 23 oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe for findings and recommendations. (Docs. 24 17, 19.) 25 26

27 1 Martin O’Malley became the Commissioner of Social Security on December 20, 2023. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Martin O’Malley is substituted 28 for Kilolo Kijakazi as Defendant in this suit. 1 Having considered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.