McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARELL MARTIN WEATHERS, No. 2:23-cv-0133 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAVID MCDONALD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 5, 2024, plaintiff notified the court of his election to amend his complaint. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff’s election was not, however, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. As a prisoner, plaintiff’s pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Since plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint, the court is unable to evaluate it. Plaintiff is advised that in an amended complaint he must clearly identify each defendant and the action that defendant took that violated his constitutional rights. The court is not required to review exhibits to determine what plaintiff’s charging allegations are as to…