(PC) Love v. CDCR Health Care Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20242:21-cv-00652California312 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARL DEMONZE LOVE, No. 2:21-cv-0652 DJC CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CDCR HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On February 9, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 20 recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice 21 to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 22 within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections (ECF No. 53) and Defendants have 23 filed a response (ECF No. 54). 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 25 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 26 are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 27 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.