Medina

(PC) Seymour v. Medina

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20241:22-cv-01146California786 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON D. SEYMOUR, No. 1:22-cv-01146 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN ITS ENTIRETY

MOTION TO INVESTIGATE

v. (ECF No. 9) DOE 1, et al.,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Defendants. CONTEMPT (ECF No. 11) 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before this Court are Plaintiff’s two motions, for the court to investigate his prison and for contempt. ECF Nos. 9, 11, respectively. For the reasons stated below, both motions will be denied. I. MOTION FOR COURT TO INVESTIGATE In Plaintiff’s motion to investigate, he states that the prison in which he is currently incarcerated is opening his mail from the Court. As a result, he asks the Court to investigate and 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.