Medina

(PC) Seymour v. Medina

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20241:22-cv-01146California786 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON D. SEYMOUR, No. 1:22-cv-01146 GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN ITS ENTIRETY

MOTION TO INVESTIGATE

13 v. (ECF No. 9) 14 DOE 1, et al.,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

15 Defendants. CONTEMPT 16 (ECF No. 11) 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 19 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 Before this Court are Plaintiff’s two motions, for the court to investigate his prison and 22 for contempt. ECF Nos. 9, 11, respectively. For the reasons stated below, both motions will be 23 denied. 24 I. MOTION FOR COURT TO INVESTIGATE 25 In Plaintiff’s motion to investigate, he states that the prison in which he is currently 26 incarcerated is opening his mail from the Court. As a result, he asks the Court to investigate and 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.