(PC) Brooks v. Lee
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY BROOKS, Case No. 2:18-cv-00374-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED
S. BEASLEY, et al., AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY
RULING BE DENIED
Defendants. ECF Nos. 103 & 104
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS 18 Plaintiff brought this case alleging that defendants S. Beasley and J. Lee violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights when they adjudicated Rules Violation Reports (“RVR”) and found him guilty without safeguarding his due process rights. He also claims that defendant Lee found him guilty in retaliation for his filing of complaints against another high-ranking officer. ECF No. 58 at 6. Now, defendants have moved for summary judgment, ECF No. 103, and plaintiff has moved to stay a ruling on that motion, ECF No. 104; what is identified on the docket as plaintiff’s…