(PC) Brooks v. Lee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20242:18-cv-00374California2,341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY BROOKS, Case No. 2:18-cv-00374-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

S. BEASLEY, et al., AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY

RULING BE DENIED

Defendants. ECF Nos. 103 & 104

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 18 Plaintiff brought this case alleging that defendants S. Beasley and J. Lee violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights when they adjudicated Rules Violation Reports (“RVR”) and found him guilty without safeguarding his due process rights. He also claims that defendant Lee found him guilty in retaliation for his filing of complaints against another high-ranking officer. ECF No. 58 at 6. Now, defendants have moved for summary judgment, ECF No. 103, and plaintiff has moved to stay a ruling on that motion, ECF No. 104; what is identified on the docket as plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.