(PC) Brooks v. Lee

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODNEY BROOKS, Case No. 2:18-cv-00374-WBS-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

14 S. BEASLEY, et al., AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY

RULING BE DENIED

15 Defendants. ECF Nos. 103 & 104 16

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

17 DAYS 18 19 Plaintiff brought this case alleging that defendants S. Beasley and J. Lee violated his First 20 and Fourteenth Amendment rights when they adjudicated Rules Violation Reports (“RVR”) and 21 found him guilty without safeguarding his due process rights. He also claims that defendant Lee 22 found him guilty in retaliation for his filing of complaints against another high-ranking officer. 23 ECF No. 58 at 6. Now, defendants have moved for summary judgment, ECF No. 103, and 24 plaintiff has moved to stay a ruling on that motion, ECF No. 104; what is identified on the docket 25 as plaintiff’s…