Thomas
Thomas v. Family Healthcare Network
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 DEANNE THOMAS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01610-NODJ-SAB
12 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING MARCH 26, 2024
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND
13 v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
14 FAMILY HEALTHCARE NETWORK, et al.,
THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
15 Defendants.
16 17 Deanne Thomas (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on November 15, 2023, against Defendants 18 Family Healthcare Network and Narwhals Mating, M.D. (ECF No. 1.) On March 13, 2024, the 19 Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendants pursuant to Plaintiff’s requests. (ECF Nos. 20 11, 12.) 21 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- 22 step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 (N.D. 23 Cal. Feb. 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for 24 affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal 25 Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is…