Thomas

Thomas v. Family Healthcare Network

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20241:23-cv-01610California372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEANNE THOMAS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01610-NODJ-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING MARCH 26, 2024

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND

v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

FAMILY HEALTHCARE NETWORK, et al.,

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

16 Deanne Thomas (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on November 15, 2023, against Defendants Family Healthcare Network and Narwhals Mating, M.D. (ECF No. 1.) On March 13, 2024, the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendants pursuant to Plaintiff’s requests. (ECF Nos. 11, 12.) Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.