(SS)Flores

(SS)Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20241:20-cv-01780California1,862 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEJANDRO ALDACO FLORES, Case No. 1:20-cv-01780-EPG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO

v. U.S.C. § 406(b)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

(ECF No. 26) Defendant. 15 16 On February 28, 2024, Counsel Monica Perales, counsel for Plaintiff Alejandro Aldaco 17 Flores, filed a motion for an award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (ECF No. 26). 18 Plaintiff and the Commissioner of Social Security were each served with a copy of the motion. (Id. at 19). Plaintiff has not filed any response to the motion. On March 7, 2024, the Commissioner filed a response providing analysis regarding the fee request but taking no position on its reasonableness. (ECF No. 29). The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 11). For the reasons set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.