Walker

(PC) Davis v. Walker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20242:10-cv-02139California1,209 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNARD DAVIS, No. 2:08-cv-0593 KJM DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 JAMES WALKER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 KENNARD DAVIS, No. 2:10-cv-2139 KJM DB 18 Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 JAMES WALKER, et al., ORDER 21 Defendants. 22

23 24 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with these civil rights actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 25 Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to be restored to competency status. (ECF No. 26 1 Plaintiff makes essentially the same allegations regarding her medical care, among other things, 27 in the two cases covered by this order and, with few exceptions, files the same documents in both cases. Therefore, the court has and will continue to issue the same orders in both cases. Unless 28 otherwise noted, the electronic filing numbers in the text refer to the docket in the 2008 case. 1 271.) This court previously found that consideration of plaintiff’s motion requires the 2 appointment of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.