Haddad

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-NODJ-SKO (PC)

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS DEFENDANTS AGATAR AND

13 v. CASTILLO

14 HADDAD, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

15 Defendants.

16 17 Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 18 action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 20 On November 16, 2023, the Court issued its Second Screening Order. (Doc. 25.) It found 21 Plaintiff stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Agatar, Castillo, 22 Castro, Haddad and Fernandez, but failed to allege any other cognizable claim against any named 23 defendant. (Id. at 4-7.) Plaintiff was directed to do one of the following within 21 days: (1) notify 24 the Court he did not wish to file a second amended complaint and instead was willing to proceed 25 only on the Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against…