Haddad
(PC) Casey v. Haddad
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-NODJ-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS DEFENDANTS AGATAR AND
v. CASTILLO
HADDAD, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On November 16, 2023, the Court issued its Second Screening Order. (Doc. 25.) It found Plaintiff stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Agatar, Castillo, Castro, Haddad and Fernandez, but failed to allege any other cognizable claim against any named defendant. (Id. at 4-7.) Plaintiff was directed to do one of the following within 21 days: (1) notify the Court he did not wish to file a second amended complaint and instead was willing to proceed only on the Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against…