Ornoski

(HC)(DP) Lenart v. Ornoski

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20242:05-cv-01912California331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS HOWARD LENART, No. 2:05-cv-01912-MCE-CKD Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY v. ORDER ROBERT L. AYERS, JR., Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a former death row inmate, is proceeding through counsel in this habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 28, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.