(SS) Rummerfield v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACK EARL RUMMERFIELD, Case No. 1:22-cv-01571-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY FOOTNOTES SHOULD BE

v. STRICKEN FROM MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS SANCTION

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL FOR VIOLATING PAGE LIMITS

SECURITY,

(ECF No. 18) Defendant. DEADLINE: CLOSE OF BUSINESS MARCH 18, 2024

18 On June 2, 2022, Jack Earl Rummerfield (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for summary judgment seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. Upon review of Plaintiff’s motion, the Court finds a willful violation of the page limits set forth in the General Civil Case Information for the undersigned. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall be ordered to show cause why the footnotes in the motion for summary judgment should not be stricken as a sanction for violating…