(SS) Rummerfield v. Commissioner of Social Security

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JACK EARL RUMMERFIELD, Case No. 1:22-cv-01571-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY FOOTNOTES SHOULD BE

13 v. STRICKEN FROM MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS SANCTION

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL FOR VIOLATING PAGE LIMITS

SECURITY,

15 (ECF No. 18) Defendant. 16 DEADLINE: CLOSE OF BUSINESS MARCH 18, 2024 17

18 19 On June 2, 2022, Jack Earl Rummerfield (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for summary judgment 20 seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” 21 or “Defendant”) denying his application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. 22 Upon review of Plaintiff’s motion, the Court finds a willful violation of the page limits set forth in 23 the General Civil Case Information for the undersigned. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall be ordered to 24 show cause why the footnotes in the motion for summary judgment should not be stricken as a 25 sanction for violating…