Residents

(PS) Littleton v. Residents

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20242:23-cv-00735California1,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LITTLETON, Case No. 2:23-cv-00735-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. SCREENING THE COMPLAINT AND

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION

RESIDENTS, et al., TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendants. ECF Nos. 1 & 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

17 Plaintiff has filed a complaint purporting to assert claims against an unidentified superior court, an unidentified district attorney’s office, and Gary Timmons, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. His complaint, however, fails to state a claim, and I will recommend that it be dismissed with leave to amend. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). Screening and Pleading Requirements A complaint must contain a short and plain statement that plaintiff is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.