(SS) Yang v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20241:22-cv-00592California1,594 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOU YANG, Case No. 1:22-cv-00592-EPG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO

12 v. EQUAL JUSTICE ACT 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 13 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF No. 24).

SECURITY,

14

15 Defendants.

16 17 On December 11, 2023, Attorney Jonathan Pena, counsel for Plaintiff Jou Vang, filed a 18 motion for an award of attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 19 2412(d). (ECF No. 24). Plaintiff and the Commissioner of Social Security were each served with 20 a copy of the motion. (ECF No. 27; ECF No. 24 at 7-8). On February 22, 2024, the Commissioner 21 filed a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion, stating that “Defendant does not oppose 22 Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act[.]”. (ECF No. 28 at 1). 23 I. BACKGROUND 24 Plaintiff filed the complaint in this case on May 18, 2022. (ECF No. 1). The parties 25 consented to this case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.