Romero

(PC) DeJesus v. Romero

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20241:23-cv-01096California6,682 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 JOE S. DEJESUS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01096-KES-EPG (PC)

11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR FAILURE

12 v. TO STATE A CLAIM AND TO DENY

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPOINT

13 J. ROMERO et al., COUNSEL

14 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 14)

15 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

16 17 Plaintiff Joe S. Dejesus is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint 19 commencing this action on July 21, 2023. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff’s complaint sets forth a series 20 of disagreements with correctional officer J. Romero at Pleasant Valley State Prison (“PVSP”) 21 regarding Plaintiff’s rights and obligations when issued a cane and ADA vest, resulting in 22 Romero issuing Plaintiff multiple Rule Violation Reports (RVRs). Plaintiff asserts claims for 23 retaliation in violation of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.