Romero

(PC) DeJesus v. Romero

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20241:23-cv-01096California6,682 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOE S. DEJESUS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01096-KES-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR FAILURE

v. TO STATE A CLAIM AND TO DENY

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPOINT

J. ROMERO et al., COUNSEL

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 14)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

16 Plaintiff Joe S. Dejesus is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on July 21, 2023. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff’s complaint sets forth a series of disagreements with correctional officer J. Romero at Pleasant Valley State Prison (“PVSP”) regarding Plaintiff’s rights and obligations when issued a cane and ADA vest, resulting in Romero issuing Plaintiff multiple Rule Violation Reports (RVRs). Plaintiff asserts claims for retaliation in violation of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.