Cameron

(PC) Taylor v. Cameron

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20242:23-cv-02353California1,000 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 2:23-cv-02353-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. THAT PLAINTIFF INDICATE HIS

INTENT TO PROCEED ONLY WITH THE

N. CAMERON, et al., CLAIMS DEEMED COGNIZABLE IN

THIS ORDER OR FILE ANOTHER

Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT ECF No. 12 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 18 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, alleges that defendants violated his First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. ECF No. 12 at 4-8. After reviewing the complaint, I find that it states viable claims against defendants S. Benavidez, A. Abarca, and N. Cameron. It fails to state a viable claim against any other defendant. Plaintiff may either proceed only with his claims against these three defendants, or he may delay serving any defendant and amend his complaint again.

28 Screening Order …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.