Cameron
(PC) Taylor v. Cameron
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 2:23-cv-02353-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. THAT PLAINTIFF INDICATE HIS
INTENT TO PROCEED ONLY WITH THE
N. CAMERON, et al., CLAIMS DEEMED COGNIZABLE IN
THIS ORDER OR FILE ANOTHER
Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT ECF No. 12 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 18 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, alleges that defendants violated his First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. ECF No. 12 at 4-8. After reviewing the complaint, I find that it states viable claims against defendants S. Benavidez, A. Abarca, and N. Cameron. It fails to state a viable claim against any other defendant. Plaintiff may either proceed only with his claims against these three defendants, or he may delay serving any defendant and amend his complaint again.
28 Screening Order …