Barrett
Barrett v. Armadillo Holdings, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PORSCHE BARRETT, on behalf of NO. 1:22-CV-00882-DJC-DB herself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated,
Plaintiff, ORDER v.
ARMADILLO HOLDINGS, LLC,
15 Defendant.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 13), arguing
that Defendant has failed to establish the requisite amount in controversy required for
jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act. For the reasons set forth below, the
Court finds that Defendant has failed to carry its burden of establishing the monetary
threshold amount for jurisdiction and accordingly GRANTS the Motion to Remand. I. Background Plaintiff is a former employee of Defendant Armadillo Holdings, LLC, doing Business as Texas Roadhouse. (Compl. (ECF No. 1, Ex. A) ¶¶ 1, 10.) Plaintiff brings claims on behalf of herself and other employees similarly situated alleging that Defendant failed to provide legally required meal and rest breaks; compensate her and other…