Barrett

Barrett v. Armadillo Holdings, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20241:22-cv-00882California5,295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PORSCHE BARRETT, on behalf of NO. 1:22-CV-00882-DJC-DB herself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated,

Plaintiff, ORDER v.

ARMADILLO HOLDINGS, LLC,

15 Defendant.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 13), arguing

that Defendant has failed to establish the requisite amount in controversy required for

jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act. For the reasons set forth below, the

Court finds that Defendant has failed to carry its burden of establishing the monetary

threshold amount for jurisdiction and accordingly GRANTS the Motion to Remand. I. Background Plaintiff is a former employee of Defendant Armadillo Holdings, LLC, doing Business as Texas Roadhouse. (Compl. (ECF No. 1, Ex. A) ¶¶ 1, 10.) Plaintiff brings claims on behalf of herself and other employees similarly situated alleging that Defendant failed to provide legally required meal and rest breaks; compensate her and other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.