(SS) Gallardo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20241:23-cv-01484California472 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OFELIA GALLARDO, Case No. 1:23-cv-01484-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND

13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDING CASE2

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

15 SECURITY,1 (Doc. No. 14)

16 Defendant. ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17 (Doc. No. 12) 18

19 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed March 14, 2024. 20 (Doc. No. 14). Plaintiff Ofelia Gallardo and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this 21 case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 22 § 405(g). (Id.). 23 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 24 25 1 The Court has substituted Martin O’Malley, who has been appointed the Acting Commissioner of Social 26 Security, as the Defendant in this suit. See Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.