Inguanzo

(PC) Miles v. Inguanzo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20242:23-cv-01098California595 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGIA MILES, No. 2:23-cv-01098-DAD-AC (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, IN PART

INGUANZO, et al., (Doc. No. 8, 11, 14) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Georgia Miles was prisoner at the Sutter County Jail when she initiated this action proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 13, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and found that “it fails to make any specific allegations against any individual and is largely unintelligible.” (Doc. No. 14 at 3.) The magistrate judge also concluded at that time that “[t]he contents of the complaint, along with plaintiff’s subsequent declaration, are sufficiently unintelligible that it is clear that leave to amend would not result in a cognizable claim.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.