Inguanzo

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGIA MILES, No. 2:23-cv-01098-DAD-AC (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, IN PART

14 INGUANZO, et al., (Doc. No. 8, 11, 14) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Georgia Miles was prisoner at the Sutter County Jail when she initiated this 18 action proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This 19 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and 20 Local Rule 302. 21 On October 13, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and 22 found that “it fails to make any specific allegations against any individual and is largely 23 unintelligible.” (Doc. No. 14 at 3.) The magistrate judge also concluded at that time that “[t]he 24 contents of the complaint, along with plaintiff’s subsequent declaration, are sufficiently 25 unintelligible that it is clear that leave to amend would not result in a cognizable claim.” …