(SS) Gill v. Commissioner of Social Security

INTRODUCTION

19 Rolando Juarez Gill (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 20 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for 21 disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on 22 the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. 23 Boone.1 24 Plaintiff requests the decision of Commissioner be vacated and the case be remanded for 25 further proceedings arguing the administrative law judge erred by not explaining a discrepancy 26 between an opinion he found to be supported and the residual functional capacity, the jobs identified 27 1 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge and this action has been assigned 1 at step five conflict with the limitations in the residual functional capacity and the vocational expert 2 was not questioned on the conflict; and no reasons were offered to reject Plaintiff’s subjective 3 complaints. (Pl.’s Mot. for Summary Judgment (“Mot.) 2, ECF No. 16.) 4 For the reasons explained herein, Plaintiff’s motion for …