Pear
(PS) Gamino v. Pear
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON MICHAEL GAMINO, Case No. 2:23-cv-02519-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
MICHAEL PEAR, ECF No. 2 Defendant.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE
DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND ECF No. 1 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
20 21 Plaintiff brings this action against Michael Pear, an “attorney/pro tem judge” who he 22 alleges presided over his traffic court and denied him the right to view a highway patrol officer’s 23 body camera footage. ECF No. 1. Defendant is immune from suit, and plaintiff’s claims are 24 barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. I will recommend that plaintiff’s compliant be dismissed 25 without leave to amend. I will grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, 26 which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§…