(SS) Murillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IRMA MURILLO, Case No. 1:23-cv-01546-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’
STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND
13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDING CASE2
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
15 SECURITY,1 (Doc. No. 14)
16 Defendant. 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed March 14, 2024. 20 (Doc. No. 14). Plaintiff Irma Murillo and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this 21 case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 22 § 405(g). (Id.). 23 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 24 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. 25 1 The Court has substituted Martin O’Malley, who has been appointed the Acting Commissioner of Social 26 Security, as the…