(SS) Laws v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20241:24-cv-00309California2,042 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ANTHONY JEROME LAWS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00309-CDB (SS)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

A COPY OF THE COMMISSIONER’S

13 v. FINAL DECISION AND A COPY OF

NOTICE RECEIVED FROM APPEALS

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, COUNCIL DENYING HIS CLAIM

15 Defendant. ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

LONG-FORM APPLICATION TO

16 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

17 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR

18 STATEMENT HE WISHES TO PROCEED

19 (Docs. 1, 2)

20 30-DAY DEADLINE

21 22 On March 14, 2024, Plaintiff Anthony Jerome Laws, proceeding pro se, filed the 23 complaint in this action. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an 24 application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). However, 25 Plaintiff’s application does not provide sufficient…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.