(PS) Sullivan v. Walmart/Spark Inc.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20242:23-cv-01397California904 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMY L. SULLIVAN, Case No. 2:23-cv-01397-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
WALMART/SPARK, Inc., ECF No. 2 Defendant.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE
DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND
FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
18 ECF No. 1
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS 21 Plaintiff brings this action against defendant Walmart Inc. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff’s allegations are frivolous, and I recommend that his complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. I will grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2).
27 28 Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma…