(PS) Sullivan v. Walmart/Spark Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMY L. SULLIVAN, Case No. 2:23-cv-01397-TLN-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

14 WALMART/SPARK, Inc., ECF No. 2 15 Defendant.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16

THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE

17 DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

18 ECF No. 1 19

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

20 DAYS 21 22 Plaintiff brings this action against defendant Walmart Inc. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff’s 23 allegations are frivolous, and I recommend that his complaint be dismissed without leave to 24 amend. I will grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the 25 showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). 26

27 28 1 Screening and Pleading Requirements 2 A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed 3 in forma…