(PS) Sullivan v. Walmart/Spark Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20242:23-cv-01397California904 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMY L. SULLIVAN, Case No. 2:23-cv-01397-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

WALMART/SPARK, Inc., ECF No. 2 Defendant.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE

DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

18 ECF No. 1

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 21 Plaintiff brings this action against defendant Walmart Inc. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff’s allegations are frivolous, and I recommend that his complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. I will grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2).

27 28 Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.