DeJoy

(PS) Patton v. DeJoy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20242:23-cv-00048California953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MEIKO S. PATTON, Case No. 2:23-cv-00048-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. FINDING THAT THE COMPLAINT FAILS

TO STATE A VIABLE CLAIM,

LOUIS DeJOY, GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND, AND

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION

Defendant. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ECF Nos. 1 & 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

18 19 20 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Postmaster General Louis DeJoy and appeals an unfavorable administrative law decision by the Equal Opportunity Commission. ECF No. 1 at 7-21. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.