DeJoy

(PS) Patton v. DeJoy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20242:23-cv-00048California953 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MEIKO S. PATTON, Case No. 2:23-cv-00048-DJC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. FINDING THAT THE COMPLAINT FAILS

TO STATE A VIABLE CLAIM,

14 LOUIS DeJOY, GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND, AND

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION

15 Defendant. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 16 ECF Nos. 1 & 2 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Postmaster General Louis DeJoy 22 and appeals an unfavorable administrative law decision by the Equal Opportunity Commission. 23 ECF No. 1 at 7-21. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. 24 Screening Order 25 I. Screening and Pleading Requirements 26 A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed 27 in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.