Mubiru

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 FRANK K MUBIRU, Case No. 1:23-cv-01597-SAB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE MOTION TO CONTINUE

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

13

CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING

14 v. CONFERENCE TO APRIL 25, 2024

15 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., MARCH 21, 2024 DEADLINE

16 Defendants. (ECF No. 11)

17 18 On March 15, 2024, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and having paid the filing fee, filed a 19 motion requesting a change of conference date, which the Court construes a motion to continue 20 the initial scheduling conference currently set for March 26, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9. 21 (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff contends the action “is not procedurally in the posture” to move forward 22 with the mandatory scheduling conference on the scheduled date because (1) Defendant did not 23 serve an answer to the complaint on the Plaintiff and (2) there is a pending motion requesting 24 entry of default. (ECF No. 12 at 1-2.) 25 The Court shall continue the scheduling conference, but not for the reasons…