Mubiru

Mubiru v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20241:23-cv-01597California663 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK K MUBIRU, Case No. 1:23-cv-01597-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE MOTION TO CONTINUE

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING

v. CONFERENCE TO APRIL 25, 2024

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., MARCH 21, 2024 DEADLINE

Defendants. (ECF No. 11)

17 On March 15, 2024, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and having paid the filing fee, filed a motion requesting a change of conference date, which the Court construes a motion to continue the initial scheduling conference currently set for March 26, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff contends the action “is not procedurally in the posture” to move forward with the mandatory scheduling conference on the scheduled date because (1) Defendant did not serve an answer to the complaint on the Plaintiff and (2) there is a pending motion requesting entry of default. (ECF No. 12 at 1-2.) The Court shall continue the scheduling conference, but not for the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.