Lamas
(PC) Wolinski v. Lamas
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, No. 2:23-CV-1467-DJC-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 KERRI M. LAMAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s original complaint. See ECF No. 1. 19 On January 19, 2024, the Court issued an order screening Plaintiff’s original 20 complaint. See ECF No. 12. The Court determined that Plaintiff states cognizable claims as 21 follows: (1) First Amendment claim against that Defendants Lamas and Pender based on alleged 22 retaliatory conduct (first claim); (2) Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Butterfield, 23 Singh, Lamas, and Schultz arising from the alleged use of excessive force on January 25, 2022 24 (second claim); and (3) Eighth Amendment medical care claims against Defendants Tran, Osmon, 25 and Nandy (third claim). See id. The Court otherwise determined…