CDCR

(PC) Henderson v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20242:23-cv-01598California455 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TOMMY BERNARD HENDERSON, Jr., Case No. 2:23-cv-01598-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MATTER

CORRECTIONS AND

15 REHABILITATION, et al.¸ FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 Defendants. THAT THIS MATTER BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY

17 WITH COURT ORDERS 18 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

19 20 On November 2, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s amended complaint and notified him that his 21 complaint did not state cognizable claims. ECF No. 6. I granted him thirty days to file an 22 amended complaint or an advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, 23 subject to a recommendation that it be dismissed. Plaintiff did not respond. Accordingly, on 24 January 17, 2024, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not 25 be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.