(SS) Cervantes v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20241:22-cv-01565California3,806 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 MICAH LEVI CERVANTES, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-1565 JLT GSA ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING 13 v. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY1, ) REQUEST TO AFFIRM THE Commissioner of Social Security, ) ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION, AND 15 ) DIRECTING ENTRY IN FAVOR OF Defendant. ) DEFENDANT 16 ) ) (Docs. 16, 18, and 20) 17 ) ) 18

19 Micah Levi Cervantes seeks judicial review of a final decision denying his application for 20 supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. (Docs. 1, 16.) Plaintiff 21 asserts the administrative law judge erred by failing to resolve a conflict between the testimony of a 22 vocational expert and the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, based upon the reasoning level required 23 for the work identified by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.