Miranda

(PC) Fregia v. Miranda

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20241:21-cv-01068California5,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK FREGIA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01068-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

GRANTING DEFENDANT SAVAGE’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MIRANDA, et al., (ECF No. 75) Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff Mark Fregia (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Ridge and Savage based on Plaintiff’s claims that Defendants were deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs by continuing to prescribe medications that caused him to suffer lichen planus, and then failed to treat such skin condition. Currently before the Court is Defendant Savage’s motion for summary judgment1 on the grounds that Defendant Savage (“Defendant”) was not deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s medical needs under the Eighth Amendment,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.