Miranda

(PC) Fregia v. Miranda

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20241:21-cv-01068California5,196 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK FREGIA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01068-JLT-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

GRANTING DEFENDANT SAVAGE’S

13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 MIRANDA, et al., (ECF No. 75) 15 Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiff Mark Fregia (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against 20 Defendants Ridge and Savage based on Plaintiff’s claims that Defendants were deliberately 21 indifferent to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs by continuing to prescribe medications that caused 22 him to suffer lichen planus, and then failed to treat such skin condition. 23 Currently before the Court is Defendant Savage’s motion for summary judgment1 on the 24 grounds that Defendant Savage (“Defendant”) was not deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s 25 medical needs under the Eighth Amendment,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.