McCauley

(PC) Gustard v. McCauley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20242:17-cv-00012California844 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER IAN GUSTARD, Case No. 2:17-cv-00012-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE

BE DENIED AND THAT PLAINTIFF BE

DOUGLAS R. McCAULEY, et al., GRANTED THIRTY DAYS TO FILE AN

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

Defendants. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ECF No. 145 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 19 Plaintiff moves to strike defendants’ motion for summary judgment for want of a Rand Notice. ECF No. 145. Defendants have filed an opposition, ECF No. 146, and plaintiff has not filed a reply within the allotted time. I recommend that the motion to strike be denied, and that plaintiff be directed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion within thirty days. The purpose of the Rand notice is to give a pro se prisoner litigant “fair notice” of the requirements…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.