McCauley
(PC) Gustard v. McCauley
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20242:17-cv-00012California844 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER IAN GUSTARD, Case No. 2:17-cv-00012-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
BE DENIED AND THAT PLAINTIFF BE
DOUGLAS R. McCAULEY, et al., GRANTED THIRTY DAYS TO FILE AN
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
Defendants. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ECF No. 145 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
18 19 Plaintiff moves to strike defendants’ motion for summary judgment for want of a Rand Notice. ECF No. 145. Defendants have filed an opposition, ECF No. 146, and plaintiff has not filed a reply within the allotted time. I recommend that the motion to strike be denied, and that plaintiff be directed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion within thirty days. The purpose of the Rand notice is to give a pro se prisoner litigant “fair notice” of the requirements…