McCauley

(PC) Gustard v. McCauley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20242:17-cv-00012California844 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER IAN GUSTARD, Case No. 2:17-cv-00012-TLN-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE

BE DENIED AND THAT PLAINTIFF BE

14 DOUGLAS R. McCAULEY, et al., GRANTED THIRTY DAYS TO FILE AN

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

15 Defendants. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 ECF No. 145 17 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 19 20 Plaintiff moves to strike defendants’ motion for summary judgment for want of a Rand 21 Notice. ECF No. 145. Defendants have filed an opposition, ECF No. 146, and plaintiff has not 22 filed a reply within the allotted time. I recommend that the motion to strike be denied, and that 23 plaintiff be directed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion 24 within thirty days. 25 The purpose of the Rand notice is to give a pro se prisoner litigant “fair notice” of the 26 requirements…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.