Epperson

Epperson v. Deutsche Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20241:24-cv-00286California1,350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRIS EPPERSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00286-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE

v. D AI MS EM NIS DS ED WITHOUT LEAVE TO 12 (Doc. 1) DEUTSCHE BANK, et al.,

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. Clerk to Assign District Judge

_____________________________________/

16 Plaintiff Chris Epperson (“Plaintiff”) proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. (Docs. 1, 6.). The complaint, filed on March 7, 2024, lists as defendants Deutsche Bank, Lyndon B. Johnson, Hary [sic] S. Truman, Ronald W. Reagon [sic], Richard M. Nixon, and Thomas Jefferson. (Doc. 1 at 1–4.) Plaintiff claims to be suing under the “Wheeler Act of Congress,” Amendment XII of the United States Constitution, and “Article II, Section 2, clause 2.” (Id. at 4.) The Court concludes that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims and recommends dismissing it without leave to amend. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.