Epperson
Epperson v. Deutsche Bank
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20241:24-cv-00286California1,350 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRIS EPPERSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00286-SKO
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE
v. D AI MS EM NIS DS ED WITHOUT LEAVE TO 12 (Doc. 1) DEUTSCHE BANK, et al.,
TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
Defendants. Clerk to Assign District Judge
_____________________________________/
16 Plaintiff Chris Epperson (“Plaintiff”) proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. (Docs. 1, 6.). The complaint, filed on March 7, 2024, lists as defendants Deutsche Bank, Lyndon B. Johnson, Hary [sic] S. Truman, Ronald W. Reagon [sic], Richard M. Nixon, and Thomas Jefferson. (Doc. 1 at 1–4.) Plaintiff claims to be suing under the “Wheeler Act of Congress,” Amendment XII of the United States Constitution, and “Article II, Section 2, clause 2.” (Id. at 4.) The Court concludes that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims and recommends dismissing it without leave to amend. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT …