Crippen
Crippen v. International Paper Co.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARINA CRIPPEN, No. 2:23-cv-01107-DAD-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLANTIFF’S MOTION
TO REMAND THIS ACTION AND
14 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., et al., DENYING DEFENDANT HENDERSON’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
15 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 16, 28) 16
17 18 This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to the San 19 Joaquin County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 16.) On September 7, 2023, the pending motion was 20 taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 22.) For the 21 reasons explained below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion to remand. 22 BACKGROUND 23 On May 5, 2023, plaintiff filed a complaint initiating this action against her former 24 employer International Paper Co. (“IPC”) and unnamed defendants Does 1–10 in the San Joaquin 25 County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1 at 17.) In her original complaint, plaintiff asserted the 26 following ten causes of…