(PC) Cordova v. Wellpath Healthcare

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20242:23-cv-01226California347 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND MARIA CORDOVA, III, No. 2:23-cv-1226 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 WELLPATH HEALTHCARE, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a Butte County Jail inmate, proceeding pro se. By order filed February 5, 18 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was 19 granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint 20 or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 22 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 23 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 24 the party is fully effective. 25 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 26 directed to assign a district judge to this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.