Blanco

(PC) McCurdy v. Blanco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20242:21-cv-01764California5,547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES C. McCURDY, No. 2:21-CV-1764-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS P. BLANCO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to partially dismiss. See ECF No. 26. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition despite having been granted several extension of time to do so. In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all allegations of material fact in the complaint as true. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93-94 (2007). The Court must also construe the alleged facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974); see also Hosp. Bldg. Co. v. Rex Hosp. Trustees, 425 U.S. 738, 740 (1976); Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam). All ambiguities or doubts must also be resolved…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.