Rivas

(PC) Porter v. Rivas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20241:22-cv-00105California542 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY JAMES PORTER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00105-KES-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS IN THE

13 v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

14 O. RIVAS, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Larry James Porter is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 On March 1, 2024, the Court issued its Second Screening Order. (Doc. 48.) The Court 20 found Plaintiff’s first amended complaint plausibly alleges an Eighth Amendment deliberate 21 indifference to serious medical needs claim (claim one), a Fourteenth Amendment Equal 22 Protection Clause violation (claim three), and a state law equal protection violation (claim four), 23 against Defendant Rivas in her individual capacity. (Id. at 6-13.) Plaintiff failed to allege any 24 other cognizable claim against Defendant Rivas or any other defendant. Plaintiff was ordered to 25 select one of the following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.