Harper

Harper v. Charter Communications, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20242:19-cv-00902California1,164 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 LIONEL HARPER, DANIEL SINCLAIR, No. 2:19-cv-00902 WBS DMC HASSAN TURNER, LUIS VAZQUEZ, and 13 PEDRO ABASCAL, individually and on behalf of all others 14 similarly situated and all ORDER aggrieved employees, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

18 Defendant. 19

20 ----oo0oo---- 21 Plaintiffs Lionel Harper and Daniel Sinclair move for 22 partial summary judgment on various alleged violations of the 23 California Labor Code. (Mot. (Docket No. 360).) The violations 24 relate to plaintiffs’ claim for unlawful calculation, deduction, 25 and payment of commission wages (Claim 5); and claim for failure 26 to provide timely and complete copies of employment records 27 (Claim 8). Harper also requests that the court determine that he 28 1 is an “aggrieved employee” pursuant to his Private Attorneys 2 General Act (“PAGA”) claim (Claim 10).

3 A. Unlawful Calculation, Deduction, and Payment of Commission Wages (Claim 5) 4 5 Harper alleges that defendant violated Labor Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.