Puckett
Puckett v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JEREMY PHILLIP PUCKETT, No. 2:22-cv-0350 KJM DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 17 Pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1) this matter came before the undersigned on March 15, 2024, for hearing of plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 112.) Attorneys Hilary Soloff, Ryan Snyder, and Harrison Frahn appeared on behalf of plaintiff, who was also present. Attorney John Whitefleet appeared on behalf of defendants. After hearing oral argument, plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission. As the parties are aware in 2001, plaintiff was prosecuted and convicted of robbery and murder. (ECF No. 36 at 2.) Almost 19 years later plaintiff’s conviction was vacated. (Id.) A year later plaintiff was found factually innocent. (Id.) This action alleges defendants violated plaintiff’s constitutional rights by withholding or ignoring exonerating evidence. (Id.) Plaintiff’s motion seeks to compel…