Newsom

(PC) Gonzalez v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20242:17-cv-00176California4,541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO AMADOR GONZALEZ, No. 2:17-CV-0176-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CLOUGH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ unopposed motion for partial summary judgement based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies as to certain defendants. See ECF No 89. Also before the Court is Defendant Sparks’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. See ECF No. 88. Plaintiff has filed objections to Defendant Sparks’ motion. See ECF No. 91. 22 I. BACKGROUND This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s seventh amended complaint. See ECF No. 62. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss some of Plaintiff’s claims, which was granted. See ECF Nos. 71, 72. Plaintiff’s surviving claims are Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Grinde, Bodenhamer, and Clough…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.