Macomber

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JUAN JOSE AMESQUITA, Case No. 1:23-cv-01604-KES-BAM (PC) 7 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

8 v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

9 MACOMBER, et al., (ECF Nos. 1, 10)

10 Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 11 12 I. Background 13 Plaintiff Juan Jose Amesquita (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 14 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 15 On March 7, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated 16 cognizable claims against Defendants Howard and Chavez for deliberate indifference to medical 17 care in violation of the Eighth Amendment for how Howard and Chavez were moving Plaintiff, 18 and that Plaintiff was saying they were hurting him, as they tried to return Plaintiff to the 19 wheelchair, and for failure to obtain medical care for Plaintiff following the vehicle 20 incident/accident, but failed to state any other cognizable…