(SS) Munoz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20241:23-cv-00385California7,262 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONATHAN DEAN IVAN MUNOZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-00385-BAM 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,

DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO

14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of AFFIRM, AND REMANDING FOR 15 Social Security,1 FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) 16 Defendant. (Docs. 13, 17) 17 18

19 INTRODUCTION 20 Plaintiff Jonathan Dean Ivan Munoz (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of 21 the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for supplemental 22 security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court 23 on Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without 24 oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.2 25

26 1 Martin O’Malley became the Commissioner of Social Security on December 20, 2023. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.